funny
 
 
The Bible's answer:
If you believe in the Bible, the chicken came first. "And the evening and the morning were the fourth day. And God said, 'Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven'." Genesis 1:19-20. Chickens are a type of fowl, so the Christian Bible says that chickens came first.
Users funny comments
Kristle says:
From a scientific prospective, the egg came first .Hear me out. You can have a wolf breed with a Chuahaha. . you can have a man breed with a Baboon. Tuchy, . No racicist intended, You can have A black , or a white , or a Brown breed From The Gods prospective, as long as we have girls they are beautifull . If the chicken came first? God said "we need somthing to eat" and "poof" Chicken : Yum. but no. Yes it is finger lickin good. but it's not the case. We made Omlets first. A little bit of wild bore.. some sea salt eggs of what you can find. tomatos, and onoims. The fact is, 1 bird f*cked another and we helped it along. Now we have chickens and eggs.... Eat it and like it!!! The Bible was made by man. The same man that is destroying the world. I'm sorry but I want to save the world. It takes money. Can you please send some to po box 1303 in erie co 80516
[17.05.2009]
Johnny says:
As for me I do believe in religion thus I say chicken is first altogether with the rooster, that we need both together (scientifically proven) to make a specific egg hatch a chick. Shades: Even logic is against science in this matter. I refer here to the existence of 2 different genders. Scientific answers aren’t convincing to me, IF I must believe that, then I must have at least 2 similar eggs with different 2 different paths of parallel evolution ending up to 1 to male and 1 to female gender at once. Then those 2 can regenerate. So to have an egg by itself going through evolution it is not logic as it will be lifeless before that time come. Till this point, it is possible but it is not proven nor logic to me. Moreover, the animal itself can undergo evolution process but not the egg as is. Anyhow, with WHAT the first egg was fertilized to hatch a rooster or chicken? I think science agrees with the regenerating process, don’t you think so? Did baby man come first or grown up man? Religion have an answer to this (in creation, it was always grown up male and female). But science must always prove that evolution should happen from a specific source (origin). But what can science say about the 2 gendesr that have existed ever since? And why the process of regeneration is less complicated than evolution. I believe evolution can change species but not make them.
[16.04.2008]
Simon Nsumbu frm DR Congo says:
Chicken naturally came first. This is like creator and creature, from the starting point is the creator, giver, author, producer then comes the creature or creation and product. A bit of lesson; people must praise and worship the creator - God rather than the creature - human being, God's work. If all chickens were killed, would we have again eggs? Absolutely no. But killing or breaking all eggs wouldn't prevent us from having other eggs.
[15.05.2007]
Brunette says:
I agree wth u "me" el nekat lezem tkoun b3ide 3an el religions, inc. Islam. la2enno kamen el Quraan kteb moqaddas.
[01.05.2007]
Fai says:
I agree with what the Bible says; For everything whether be a man or what, was created by God! So it's true the chicken came first, as to the God's creativity. believe it or not - This is the fact
[23.04.2007]
Kennedy Lyimo says:
I agree with the Bible that God has created all things including the chicken when he created the world so the Bible is 100% perfect and who ever denied it let him be so but at the end he will know the truth and it will set him free.
[01.12.2006]
me says:
ma 3refna l kor2an chu bi oul bass! bass tnakto ma tjibo sirit l injil, ma3 e7tiramee la elkoun guys. bass ba3do l nekat 3an l religion, ma 3refna l nabee chu oul aw 3ali ben abi taleb masslan?
[10.11.2006]
Rational says:
Well shades man for sure its ur right to believe or not, but usually if u talk science wise and r much into science, the primary fact in science is that u dun give theories that ur not sure 100% off.So saying that faith has not been proven yet, well u should make some researches.Anyway if u want to talk science wise, why dun u check this and see what some highly known scientists said about GOD and faith : http://www.tommyswindow.com/english/science_faith_med.pps after all science is discovered by intelligence, and intelligence is not created by nature just like that, who created nature?a bug? ok who created the bug? another bug? ok who created the other bug?and on and on, in the end u will reach a unique truth , that whatever the steps where, there is a holy hand in this, anyway check the link i gave u.
[19.10.2006]
only a lebanese says:
i'm sorry bro for being so rude first. Second i can mail u in some weeks all the "discoveries" of the science and what they turned out to be... anywyas, we can talk. if u want my mail just tell me.
[11.10.2006]
Shades says:
the bible is just a book dude... religion has never been proven... u say its a matter of "faith" , yet it has not been proven.. whereas, for evolution and science, there are no doubts, the proof is there.
[11.10.2006]
only a lebanese says:
Shades, the most important is not what is more convincing, but what is true. The bible is the word of God, THE TRUTH, so it is the truth. Anyways, if the djeje or the bayda came first, if u don't beleive God's word u will go straight to hell! Sorry man, but that's a second truth. And Bravo Rachel, i beleive too.
[10.10.2006]
Shades says:
I say , u should check the scientific answer (which has proven that the EGG came first)... u ll find it more convincing ;)
[08.10.2006]
Rachel says:
Perfect answer :-) and 100% biblical. I do believe this too
[07.10.2006]

Add your personal comments/answer:
What do they call you? : *
 
Say it your way or just comment:*
 
Email:*
 
Do you have a website?:
 
Write down what u see in the eggs to prevent spam messages:*
(Please use capital letters)
   
   
 
Due to many users complaints and to some unconvenient and impolite and meaningless comments that were added to the site, whichcame1st.com team decided to erase all of them and to only accept in the future those that he shall see suitable after review.
Please do not use whichcame1st.com to post any material which is inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, impolite, sexually oriented or harmful to people's privacy.
Please remember that we are not responsible for any messages posted.The messages express the views of the author of the message. Any user who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to Contact us immediately.We have the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so.